Modern economics does not distinguish between renewable and nonrenewable materials, as its very method is to equalize and quantify everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternative fuels, like coal, oil, wood, or water-power: the only difference between them recognized by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and “uneconomic.” From a Buddhist point of view, of course, this will not do; the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water-power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non- renewable goods must be used only if they are indispensable, and then only with the greatest care and the most meticulous concern for conservation. To use them heedlessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be attainable on this earth, there is nonetheless an ineluctable duty on man to aim at the ideal of non-violence in all he does.
About Staff Reports
Transition Voice is the online magazine on peak oil, climate change, economic crisis, and the Transition Town movement. Located in Staunton, Virginia, Transition Voice was designed by Curren Media Group. Transition Voice welcomes content submissions and donations of support. All articles on Transition Voice are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.