Climate change a threat multiplier for global crisis

lightning storm

A high pressure front is running along our whole economy. Photo: powazny/flickr.

This article is re-posted, with permission, from R. Michael Conley’s “Weathering the Storm” email newsletter, intended to explain the coming crisis brought on by climate change, peak oil and the economic crisis to business leaders. — Ed.

The forces of the perfect storm are intensifying; the danger more imminent. Its fury will intensify as colliding forces reach critical mass and trigger a chain reaction of immense proportions. In this issue, ?Weathering the Storm’s publisher, R. Michael Conley, discusses the perfect storm’s triggering mechanisms and warning signs that are pointing to its tempo and direction.

WTS: What can you say about the events that will trigger the perfect storm?

Conley: Short of something like a nuclear attack, a sudden bursting of the global credit bubble or sharp cut-off of global oil supply, the perfect storm is more likely to be triggered incrementally – culminating in a chain reaction as powerful forces reach critical mass. Unlike the Pearl Harbor attack that launched WWII and crisply identified our challenges and objectives, the perfect storm’s triggering mechanisms will be insidious, complex and incremental – a condition I refer to as “crisis creep.” (Please see the Volume I, Issue I newsletter for a description of the perfect storm)

Metaphorically, I liken the perfect storm to a perpetually rising sea held at bay by a giant dike – in this case, our global infrastructure. Over time, the rising water flows over the dike, and the weakened dike absorbs more water than it can handle. It starts to leak until the pressure points against it reach an unsustainable level. The dike is then crushed by the raging waters that wreak unimaginable havoc on those caught in its floodplain.

WTS: What makes our global infrastructure so vulnerable today?

Conley: Back to my analogy, our “dike” is a house of cards ready to implode under its own weight. Its greatest strength – its interconnectedness – is also its greatest weakness. While it may initially have the strength to resist a collapse, it has a far greater potential for systemically unraveling over a prolonged period of time.

To be sure, every generation has had its own unique set of challenges, but the perfect storm is different in many respects. Consider this:

  1. The globalization of the world economy – with its intertwined financial and trading systems – is unprecedented. Threats today are exponentially larger and longer lasting, as evidenced by the still lingering banking and sovereign debt crises that started in 2008.
  2. The explosively growing global population of over 7.5 billion people is placing an unprecedented strain on finite global resources. With little margin for error, an energy, environmental or economic crisis in any one country, region or sector can have a huge ripple effect in all other areas.
  3. Energy and climate change forces are aggravating these threats as the accessibility and affordability of global oil becomes problematic and climate-induced droughts and famines become significant threat multipliers.

WTS: When do you expect the perfect storm to rear its ugly head?

Conley: It has already started. The storm forces are building and infrastructure conditions are ripe for the pickings. It’s only a matter of time before critical mass is reached and an unstoppable chain reaction is triggered; one can see the forces building.

WTS: Before commenting on these forces and their triggering mechanisms, could you say something about your storm tracking methodology?

Conley: Well first, I use my perfect storm model (illustrated below) to sub-divide the storm forces into key categories. I use a set of metrics to measure trend lines wherever possible and then track the secondary indicators influencing the storm’s trajectory, tempo, and triggering points.

For example, a bursting global credit bubble could trigger an economic collapse, but it won’t happen over night. So, instead, I track the secondary forces that are pushing us into such a crisis. The trajectories are ominous.

Perfect Storm graphic

WTS: What storm forces do you find most troubling at this time?

Conley: The list is long, so let me focus on just four titanic forces of greatest concern:

  1. The potential bursting of the global credit bubble and its catastrophic impact
  2. Significant new geo-political threats with explosive implications
  3. An imminent decline in global oil supply and inability to meet global demand
  4. Climate tipping points that foment droughts, famines and weather disasters

WTS: Could you say more about your list and the secondary indicators you monitor?

Conley: The global economy is our most immediate danger. The systemic threats are long, deep and interconnected. For instance, sovereign debt and national banking systems are now intertwined; public and private risk is comingled through derivatives, bailouts and fiscal and monetary policies, and the global economy integrally links the financial systems of all countries. A threat to one country or banking system is a threat to all.

For example, twenty years ago a bankrupt Greece would have been a tragedy for the people of Greece; today, it threatens to unravel the entire Euro Zone (EZ) structure along with its PIIGS partners, Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain. Couple that with the United States, reeling in debt and facing a “fiscal cliff” of its own in 2013, and it is clear things could unravel in a hurry.

My greatest fear is that panicky governments will print money recklessly to monetize debt to “save” their economies; while in the process creating conditions that could lead to hyperinflation – a game-changer of enormous consequence.

WTS: What are some of the secondary indicators you track for this possibility?

Conley: I keep a close eye on the European Union situation. It represents about 20% of the world’s GDP and is a major trading partner for both the United States and China. Within the European Union, I’m most concerned with the 17 Euro-Zone nations – particularly the PIIGS contingent with an aggregated debt to GDP ratio large enough to overwhelm the entire European Union and send economic shockwaves around the world.

The skyrocketing sovereign debt of the PIIGS nations is alarming, and I watch the proximity of their ten-year debt-servicing rates to the 7% threshold many think is unsustainable. Spain has already exceeded that level. Further, the debt ratings and Euro currency exchange rates are good bellwethers of things to come. The seesaw balance between the fiscal controls the PIIGS are willing to accept and Germany’s appetite to underwrite their losses makes the outcome less than clear.

WTS: Changing gears to America’s so-called “fiscal cliff,” what are your concerns?

Conley: As the world’s largest economy, anything we do has a huge ripple effect on the global economy. The fiscal cliff refers to the combination of tax hikes and spending cuts scheduled to take place on January 1, 2013. Together, they will take about $600 billion out of the economy in 2013 alone; an action that could trigger another recession. Sadly, political gridlock is preventing this from being addressed in a timely manner.

The fiscal cliff is only the tip of the iceberg. Our growing debt to GDP ratio and debt servicing charges; the budgetary drain from unfunded entitlement benefits now paid out to baby boomers retiring in droves, and our willingness to print money and borrow about forty cents on every dollar spent by the federal government are troublesome indicators. It’s hard to see how we can avoid a ratings downgrade and/or the longer term threat to the American dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency. By contrast, the Chinese Yuan is growing daily in it international strength.

WTS: You mentioned geo-political threats with explosive implications. What are they?

Conley: The global hot spots are everywhere. Rather than list every one that comes to mind, let me suggest a few categorical threats:

  • Game-changers: I would include here threats that could immediately destabilize the world order such as a shooting war with Iran. The Arab Spring movement could also turn nasty and threaten our access to oil; imagine what an unfriendly regime change in Saudi Arabia could mean to the global oil markets. Follow the oil trail if you want an indicator of where a future crisis might occur.
  • Asymmetric threats: Threats of this nature could include cyber-attacks that degrade major avenues of commerce, energy production and our national security. It could include terrorist attacks on an oil choke point or other critical targets, or it could involve something more subtle like undermining the petrodollar currency system. The list is endless.
  • Superpower challenges: China’s growing might has changed the global landscape and intensified the competition for finite global resources. Look for a growing presence of U.S. forces in the Pacific, and brace for new “incidents’ occurring in the East and South China Seas as China competes for new-found undersea resources. The emerging roles of India, Brazil and Russia will also change the picture. It’s a volatile world.

The list is too long to cover here, but almost anything I’ve mentioned could start a chain reaction that triggers the perfect storm. The pre-conditions are ripe.

WTS: You cite the global oil supply and demand equation as a threat; why?

Conley: The global oil situation is never far from my thoughts. We’re approaching a point where global demand will outpace supply. Had we not had a stagnant global economy that has quelled the demand for oil, we might’ve reached that point long ago. As China and India grow their economies and increase their oil consumption; as oil producing nation’s use more of their own oil and export less; and as the immutable laws of geology remind us that oil is a finite resource and that the existing reserves will be increasingly costly to extract, we’ll soon feel the pinch. The threat lies in the fact that we have no scalable alternative energy systems to replace oil; the economic fallout from future oil shortfalls could be severe. (See Volume I, Issue 2 newsletter).

WTS: What are some of the secondary indicators you look at to assess the oil risk?

Conley: I try not to over-fixate on media hype suggesting there’s nothing to worry about if we will only “drill baby drill.” Instead, I use a plethora of government and international reports on oil production and consumption rates by countries and cartels.

I stay current on such things as oil depletion rates, new discoveries, OPEC vs. non-OPEC production, and strategic policies of nations with respect to oil. Global events in the Middle East, Iran and oil-producing nations are of particular interest, and OPEC’s growing concern with the petrodollar system – so advantageous to the U.S. – has to be closely monitored.

Long story short: The oil situation is likely to play a huge contributory role in the perfect storm – either directly or indirectly. Oil prices are most assuredly contributing to our current economic malaise. In the U.S., for example, oil prices become an economic drag whenever they exceed 4% of GDP. That puts us in the red zone whenever oil prices exceed $90 per barrel – a price that now seems to be almost a semi-permanent fixture.

WTS: You mentioned climate change as an area of concern. Please comment.

Conley: While climate change may not be an immediate catalyst for triggering the perfect storm, I agree with the military and intelligence agencies that call it a “threat multiplier.” The droughts and famines caused by climate-induced weather patterns are taking a frightening toll all over the globe. Its impact will vary by region, but it fosters regional conflicts everywhere. It may soon play out in remote regions such as the Arctic – as melting sea ice reveals a mineral-rich treasure trove that will be aggressively contested by several nations, including the United States.

The record high temperatures in the United States and massive droughts over 65% of the nation impact everything from crop production and food prices to the amount of water-intensive hydraulic fracturing we can employ to secure shale oil-based natural gas and oil. The financial impact of unprecedented forest fires – precipitated by record dry conditions – and/or costly weather disasters fomented by climate change are threats that add fuel to the fire.

The metrics and climate change trajectory lines – such as the growth in CO2 parts per million (PPM), unprecedented polar summer sea ice loses and glacial melts, rising ocean acidification levels and so forth – are of longer duration, but clear. While the climate change threat is less obvious than others, it could become the greatest threat mankind has ever faced.

WTS: You’ve covered a lot of ground. How would you sum up this interview?

Conley: The perfect storm is not an abstract concept. It’s for real and it’s already in motion. Its insidious trajectories disguise the lethality of the threat – we don’t even see it coming. The quicker we recognize the true nature of the risk and how it is evolving, and the faster we take constructive countermeasures to mitigate its sharper edges, the better off we will all be. I invite readers to download my free 32 page “Weathering the Storm” guide for practical ideas on how to prepare for the storm.

– R. Michael Conley, Transition Voice

You might also enjoy

Comments

  1. karyn says

    I would like to download the Weathering the Storm guide but don’t know how to access it? The link in my google reader doesn’t work and this page doesn’t have a link? I can’t find it when searching the website? Thanks.

  2. Dan Pangburn says

    The average global temperature trend has been flat since 2001. No amount of spin can rationalize that the CO2 increase caused the temperature increase to 2001 but that 25.2% additional CO2 increase had no effect on average global temperature after 2001. Without human caused global warming there can be no human caused climate change.

    • says

      Dan, you’re just wrong. The last ten years have been the hottest on record: http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20100728_stateoftheclimate.html. And, nearly each year, it’s been getting hotter. For example, 2012 has been the hottest ever: http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0703/Why-has-2012-been-the-hottest-year-on-record-in-the-US. Climate change is a grave threat to human civilization and people should stop playing politics about it and start getting to work to slow it down and eventually stop it.

      • Dan Pangburn says

        Average GLOBAL temperature anomalies are reported on the web by NOAA, GISS, Hadley, RSS and UAH. This is the data that I use. The first three all draw from the same pool of surface measurement data. The last two draw from a common pool of satellite measurements. Each agency processes the data slightly differently from the others. Each believes that their way is most accurate. To avoid bias, I average all five. The averages are listed here.

        2001 0.3473
        2002 0.4278
        2003 0.4245
        2004 0.3641
        2005 0.4663
        2006 0.3930
        2007 0.4030
        2008 0.2598
        2009 0.4022
        2010 0.5298
        2011 0.3317

        A straight line (trend line) fit to this data has no slope. That means that, for over a decade, average global temperature has not changed i.e. that “The average global temperature trend has been flat since 2001”

      • Dan Pangburn says

        Pointing out that it is warmest at the end of a warming period is not very profound and says nothing about whether it is still warming.

  3. Dan Pangburn says

    Average global temperatures since they have been accurately measured world wide are calculated with an accuracy of 88% using the equation shown at http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=8393 It uses the time-integral of sunspot numbers, appropriately reduced by energy radiated from the planet, as a proxy for energy retained by the planet. This is combined with an effective ocean temperature cycle of about +/- 1/6C to get the accuracy of 88%. The accuracy is increased by about 0.5% by including the influence of carbon dioxide. The equation predicts a decline of about 0.1C per decade.

    • says

      Sorry, Dan, I’m not going to argue with you about climate science. I’m not a qualified climatologist — and, judging from your quoting a well known climate-denier website run by British physicist (not a climatologist either) Piers Corbyn, who claims that climate change is a hoax but also claims to accurately predict volcano eruptions — it’s clear that you are not a climatologist either. I’ll take my climate science from actual climate scientists, like those at NOAA, thank you very much. Don’t waste our time with junk science put out by quacks paid to lie by the fossil fuel industry.

  4. bobgnote says

    The idea sunspots are somehow reduced, by energy radiated, from “the planet” is about as valid as since the Earth is flat, when the Greenland and East Antarctic sheet ice melt, all the water will slide off the edge.

    FYI: Sunspots and solar intensity are mild, but we are at the peak of cycle 24, as of 2013, which will be the mildest sunspot cycle, since the one, which peaked 1928. A lot of perennial ice is melting, which has kept average global temperatures, to a minimum. Yet thousands of high-temp records just fell, 2011-2012.

    FYFI: Any time atmospheric CO2 concentration rises, even partly as fast, as today, the Earth suffers a mass extinction event. In our Mass Extinction Event 6, extinctions are projected at over 100 x normal. Of course, as climate continues to be affected, by runaway global warming, die-offs will lead to extinctions, of entire families. We may challenge, for top killer, of all geologic time.

    The trend will be for warming to accelerate, with oceanic acidification. We are only in Phase I, of runaway warming. Climate is only starting to change. But CO2 should have maxed out, at 280 ppm, like it has, for every climate cycle, in the last 800,000 years. Temperatures should be swinging down, over 80-100K years, while CO2 should bottom out, at 180 ppm, and then, over 5-8K years, temperatures and atmospheric CO2 shoot up, to the same levels, as 100,000 years, earlier.

    Somebody set fire, to anything flammable, while cutting forests, with chainsaws, I say. Dr.Muller of CAL claims his grad student Robert Rhode analyzed existing data, to prove human causes, for warming, since the 1700s. Cumulative human impact had to reduce CO2 respiration and exchange, you know?

    So CO2 is hitting 400 ppm, and it is likely headed, for way over 1000 ppm, while CH4 is out-gassing, faster than before any previous mass extinction, and the atmosphere is also affected by a lot of industrial GHGs, which didn’t exist, before the 20th Century. So the Earth won’t clear the GHGs, for at least a couple of hundred thousand years, unless we help, A LOT.

    We aren’t helping. Corruption has a carbon footprint, and the US exports war, in all directions, including to prevent industrial hemp, from becoming the number one cash crop and energy, food, and building resource, in the world, since FDR sold out to Andrew Mellon and the Hearsts, with timber and oil money, so Democrats passed and FDR signed the Hemp Stamp Tax Act of 1938, right as a hemp processor was developed. Prison and petroleum and drug cartels have an uneasy alliance, to keep hemp as contraband, for profiteers, with a huge carbon footprint.

    We also need algae and switchgrass, for biomass, and we need to re-green all deserts and polluted areas, or we will face more danger, in the fast-approaching Phase II, of global warming, and we may not have live humans, during Phase III, of global warming.

    As GHG concentrations rise, temperature increases, slightly, but oceanic acidification starts to kill eggs, little fish, plankton, oysters, and CORALS. The coral record shows us what happens, when CO2 went off the hook, millions of years, ago, in each mass extinction. Ignore this, at our peril.

    As the northern ice cap melts, more each summer, and glaciers melt, and any perennial ice is threatened, GHG concentrations increase. A tipping point approaches, when the northern ice cap will melt, every summer, and for part of the northern summer, the Earth will absorb a lot more solar energy.

    The northern hemisphere is already warming, faster than the southern hemisphere. When we hit that failure, of northern cap ice albedo, the Earth will warm up, so Greenland and East Antarctic sheet ice start to fail, in the early stages, of Phase II. Temperature increases will accelerate, so instead of 3-1 high temp records, vs. low temp records, like today, we will suffer 20-1 high vs. low records, say, 2030-2050.

    By the time all the sheet ice melts, we won’t have any more heat sink, the sea will be 70 m higher, and the Earth AND oceans will be very warm. Jellyfish will rule the seas. HS2 respirators will evolve. And then, the heavy lunar tides will make Phase III of runaway warming really miserable, which has not only MORE, BIGGER STORMS, but also a lot of seismic and volcanic events.

    Any humans left alive in Phase III of runaway global warming will be uniquely suited, to survive the Anthrocene Thermal Optimum. We won’t re-glaciate, or we won’t see re-glaciation, unless humans have a way, of clearing GHGs, such as re-greening everywhere AND using machines, to filter the air and water.

    You know, all the desirable water life will die, before all the humans die, but no species will be spared die-offs. As for that theory, about the Earth affecting sunspots, what is the origin, of that absolutely absurd idea? We are in the opening stages, of M.E.E.6, still during Phase I, of runaway warming.

    Get some better science, please. It’s a life-or-death matter, you know!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


nine − 7 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>